Cases 161 - 170 of 5,177
Davis v. Hamby et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
Josh Hamby and Big Spring Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Quincey M Ross, Tim Leonard, Tad Huntsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayde Coleman v. Josh Peters, et al
as 23-3353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYDE COLEMAN and WAYDE M. COLEMAN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH A. PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Marion County and others
Moreing v. Army
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Josh Moreing
Defendant:
Army
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305 Review of Federal Contract
Howell et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Howell and Josh Howell
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Beshara, et al.
as 24-654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY E. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MINA BESHARA, LUU, DAVID ROBLESS and others
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, OC Josh Tewalt, Brett Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Josh Pompey v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
JOSH POMPEY
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 24-625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, Idaho Judicial Council, JOSH TEWALT, BRETT PHILLIPS, Access to Courts Coordinator State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
