Cases 11 - 20 of 1,221
Springer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01809
Plaintiff:
Leslie Springer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Rocky Springer v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv02235
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rocky Springer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Carrie Alexander
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11152
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and Philips RS North America LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Yoon v. Malibu Boats, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Seongjae Yoon
Defendant:
Malibu Boats, Inc., Jack Springer, Bruce Beckman and others
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Springer et al v. Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Lisa Springer and 3M Company
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
