Cases 11 - 20 of 22
(PC) Gibbs v. Webb et al
as 2:2018cv02817
Defendant:
Dave Kent, B. Rodgers, C. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv02203
Plaintiff:
DIANNE B RODGERS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
John B Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Acoma Ceremonial Shield
as 1:2016cv00832
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Acoma Ceremonial Shield
Claimant:
Ann B Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. Rodgers
as 2:2014cv02073
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jerry B. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Baca v. Jeffers, et al
as 4:2013cv02968
Plaintiff:
David O. Baca
Defendant:
State of California , Grimes , True and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Bryant et al
as 1:2013cv00897
Plaintiff:
Paul Thompson
Defendant:
E. Bryant, Haase and B. Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Central New Mexico Community C, et al
as 10-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL KEITH REYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE, FNU KEAR, Lt., B. RODGERS and others
Reyes v. Central New Mexico Community College et al
as 1:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith Reyes
Defendant:
Central New Mexico Community College, FNU Kear, B. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEILL v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
EMMIT L. MCNEILL
Defendant:
BRANDON SCOTT, JEREMY R. CLEARY, B. RODGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
