Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Addison v. Hayden et al
as 5:2012cv02620
Plaintiff:
Quindele Addison
Defendant:
Steve Hayden, Jessie Scriber, Kevin Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louden, LLC v. Martin et al
as 4:2012cv04548
Plaintiff:
Louden, LLC
Defendant:
Bill Martin and Mary Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Bill Martin Parker
as 12-60047
Debtor:
In re: BILL MARTIN PARKER
Appellant:
ALBERT P. WILCOX
Appellee:
BILL MARTIN PARKER
Jones #260563 v. Canlas et al
as 2:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jessie E. Jones #260563
Defendant:
Bienvenido Canlas, Margaret Comfort, Michael Engelsgjerd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Frommer et al
as 1:2011cv02715
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Key
Defendant:
Pete Frommer, John Medlin, Martin Sawer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Glover
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Wyoming Department of Corrections, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Tesoro Corp et al
as 2:2011cv01413
Plaintiff:
Bill Martin
Defendant:
Tesoro Corp , Koch Industries Inc , ConocoPhillips Pipe Line Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk Matthew Schultz v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant:
Jon Namle, Karen Netherton, Julissa Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Matthew Schultz doing business as Whipstocking Idea Co. doing business as No Mow Yard Inc. doing business as Clothes Line Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Nichols v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv01660
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nichols
Defendant:
Joel Williams, Bill Martin, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv11081
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jones
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Michael Engelsgjard, Richard Miles and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
