Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Insurance Company v. Pixarbio Corporation
as 22-705
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pixarbio Corporation, Francis Reynolds, Kenneth Stromsland and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mintz Fraade Law Firm P.C.
Chris Jaye v. Gubir Grewal, et al
as 21-8031
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. FREDA L. WOLFSON, US Chief Judge, BALLARD SPAHR LLP, GUILLERMO ARGOTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Defendant:
John Smiley, Holland & Hart, LLP, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAYE v. GREWAL et al
as 2:2021cv01566
Defendant:
ROBERT KUGLER, Guillermo Argote, WILLIAM WALSH and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaye v. Grewal et al
as 6:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Robert Kugler, Freda L Wolfson, Guillermo Argote and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00235
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00209
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00204
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
