Cases 11 - 20 of 379
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HULSEBUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14927
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY HULSEBUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Parker
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhoden v. Herschberger et al
as 5:2023cv04045
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Rhoden
Defendant:
Timothy Herschberger and Brittany Hedstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Essentia Insurance Company (CONSENT)
as 2:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Clayton
Defendant:
Essentia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Robbins v. Torres
as 3:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Robbins
Defendant:
Aubree Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bobby Grady v. Louise Flanagan
as 23-5097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant / Appellee:
Louise W. Flanagan, U.S. District Court Judge
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Edwards v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
Bobbie Ray Edwards
Respondent:
Stanley Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRADY v. REESE et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant:
Sargeant Reese and Lt. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
