Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Steven Gray v. Nelson Smith
as 26-2227
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TYLER GRAY
Defendant:
NELSON SMITH, Commissioner, AMY SMILEY, Chief Executive Officer, AZURE BARON, Director of Psychology and Foresnsic Services and others
Rosemond v. Farr et al
as 3:2026cv03925
Plaintiff:
Brandi Rosemond
Defendant:
Emily Farr, Tracy Adams, Laquita Clark-Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boykin v. Scerbo
as 1:2026cv02963
Plaintiff:
Brandy L Boykin
Defendant:
Claudia M Scerbo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In Re: Dante A. Hyndman
as 26-2497
Respondent:
TONY DACOSTA GREENIDGE, BELINDA NUNEZ, WESTCHESTER COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
DANTE A. HYNDMAN
Cantu v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv02167
Plaintiff:
Brandi Cantu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carter v. Wells Fargo & Company Severance Plan 2025 et al
as 3:2026cv03903
Plaintiff:
Brandi Carter
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company Severance Plan 2025 and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Fiori et al v. Warren
as 4:2026cv01212
Plaintiff:
Jerry Flores Fiori and Brandi Bryant
Defendant:
L. M. Warren doing business as The Shores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Darrah v. Wilcox et al
as 8:2026cv01675
Plaintiff:
Nichole L. Darrah
Defendant:
Brandie Wilcox, Clinton County, New York, Senior Investigator Caron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARRETT v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
TRINIA M GARRETT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ROBERTS, SHAWN EMMONS, TASHELL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
