Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv12103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brian DanielIn re: Brian Daniel
as 22-5917
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN DANIEL, aka Brian Daniels
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PIZARRO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09051
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DANIEL PIZARRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PATTERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. CABALETTA BIO, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LYNNE PATTERSON
Defendant:
CABALETTA BIO, INC., STEVEN A. NICHTBERGER, ANUP MARDA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Offerpad LLC et al v. Harvey et al
as 2:2021cv01375
Plaintiff:
Offerpad LLC and Offerpad Incorporated
Defendant:
Brian Daniel Harvey, Mary Gabrielle Harvey and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Transplace Texas, LP v. Daniels
as 4:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Brian Daniels
Plaintiff:
Transplace Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DANIEL LAWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ballesteros v. Stek et al
as 3:2020cv06207
Defendant:
Nathanlie Zavala, Randy Vandiemen, Anthony Pianto and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Arranga Ballesteros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75665
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65276
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DANIEL LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
