Cases 11 - 20 of 676
BRINKLEY v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2023cv04913
Petitioner:
ALBERT BRINKLEY
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brinkley v. Does
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Leo Brinkley
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv04825
Plaintiff:
RALPH MCCLAIN
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KRASNER, KAREN SIMMONS, PAUL DIMAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv16116
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis #200318 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Davis #200318
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, L. Parish, Thomas Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Pascoe v. Brandon Brinkley, et al
as 23-5917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PASCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON LEE BRINKLEY and JOHN N. LYONS
Brinkley v. Dr. Claude et al
as 1:2023cv15060
Plaintiff:
Jarvis H. Brinkley
Defendant:
Dr. Claude, Dr. Lombardi, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez et al v. FuboTV, Inc.
as 0:2023cv61961
Plaintiff:
Javier Perez and Denise Brinkley
Defendant:
FuboTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brinkley v. Philo, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Denise Brinkley
Defendant:
Philo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evans et al v. BET Streaming, LLC
as 6:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Evans and Denise Brinkley
Defendant:
BET Interactive, LLC and BET Streaming, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
