Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Powell v. EXI, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Powell
Defendant:
EXI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jordan v. Powell et al
as 2:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jordan
Defendant:
Nipper Transportation Inc., Christopher Powell and Elizabeth Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. CITY OF BRIGANTINE et al
as 1:2021cv01983
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JIM BENNET, JOHN DOE ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE EMPLOYEES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv02968
Petitioner:
Christopher Powell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Powell v. Arnoldussen et al
as 2:2020cv02185
Defendant:
Deputy Arnoldussen, Corporal Risley and John or Jane Doe Nurses
Plaintiff:
Terence Christopher Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Rogers et al
as 2:2020cv02133
Defendant:
Deputy Sammy Rogers and Officer Judkins
Plaintiff:
Terence Christopher Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77727
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamison et al v. Central Mississippi Correction Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Central Mississippi Correction Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison and Christopher Powell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Christopher Powell
as 19-14095
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER POWELL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SILVA et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03329
Plaintiff:
ROGER RATHBUN, WAYNE ROSEBROCK, MATTHEW PUCCINI and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
