Cases 11 - 20 of 261
(PC) Lorenz v. Movey et al
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorenz
Defendant:
Movey and Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL CAMBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murillo v. McVay et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Mona S. Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. McVay, CDCR Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Niccolls v. March et al
as 3:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Justin Niccolls
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff Office, Jack Cambell, . March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rafael Martirosyan v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv03346
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martirosyan
Defendant:
St. Andre, K. Wiser, Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Paul Matera, Ruth Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. CAMBELL et al
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. OWENS
Defendant:
CAMBELL, HEATHER PANGOELD, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian-Bey v. Whitmer et al
as 4:2023cv10445
Plaintiff:
Eddie Armail Julian-Bey
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, Sherman Cambell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
