Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Pettigrew et al v. Cartus Financial Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv04099
Plaintiff:
Harold T. Pettigrew and Delores Pettigrew
Defendant:
Cartus Financial Corporation , Richard Heineman and Jennifer Heineman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALLACE et al v. CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv05058
Plaintiff:
KELLE WALLACE and ANDREW BURKUS
Defendant:
CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION , DAVID SHEPHERD and SELINDA SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Cartus Corp
as 3:2014mc00102
Echavarria v. Cartus Corporation
as 3:2013cv04540
Defendant:
Cartus Corporation
Plaintiff:
Debra Echavarria
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pringle v. Atlas Van Lines et al
as 4:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Monique Pringle
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines and Cartus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Egan et al v. Cartu
as 2:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bruce L Egan and Richard A Heise, Sr
Defendant:
Joshua Cartu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Cartus Financial Corporation v. Johnstone, Remmey & Shryock, LLC, d/b/a Artisan Custom Homes et al
as 3:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Cartus Financial Corporation
Defendant:
Johnstone, Remmey & Shryock, LLC, Johnstone & Shryock, LLC and Service Plumbing of Charlotte, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tompkins et al v. Cartus Corp.
as 3:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Tompkins and Arminda L. Tompkins
Defendant:
Cartus Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rickey v. Cartus Corp. et al
as 4:2010cv01482
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rickey
Defendant:
Cartus Corp. , Unirisc, Inc. and Clark & Reid Moving Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deschoolmeester et al v. Cartus Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01538
Plaintiff:
David Deschoolmeester and Christine Dick
Defendant:
Cartus Corporation and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
