Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sarah Bulut v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 23-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH A. BULUT
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, TRACY PAI MANAGEMENT LTD, RUMELIA CAPITAL and others
BULUT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
SARAH A BULUT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., TRACY PAI MANAGEMENT LTD., RUMELIA CAPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cartu et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Defendant:
David Cartu, Joshua Cartu, Orlando Union Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 25
Weeks et al v. Tracy PAI Management LTD et al
as 4:2020cv00622
Plaintiff:
Sharon Plett, Philip McNamee, Larry Kocherhans and others
Defendant:
Tracy PAI Management LTD and David Cartu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Ryals et al
as 4:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Scott, Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Cartus Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cartus Corporation et al v. Sweeney et al
as 3:2016cv02001
Plaintiff:
Cartus Corporation and Cartus Financial Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel Sweeney and Century 21 Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTUS CORPORATION et al v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2015cv06789
Plaintiff:
CARTUS CORPORATION and CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
DANIEL SWEENEY and LONG & FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
