Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Henry v. USA
as 3:2016cv00301
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Timothy Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Knights of Columbus et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gerald I. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Knights of Columbus, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tucker v. Colvin(CONSENT)
as 1:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Charles Timothy Tucker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smith v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv02771
Plaintiff:
Charles Timothy Smith
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and Carl H. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparrow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00847
Plaintiff:
Charles Timothy Sparrow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BERG, M.D. et al v. HAGEL
as 1:2013cv00502
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH BERG, M.D. and SARAH DELANEY-ROWLAND, M.D.
Defendant:
CHARLES TIMOTHY HAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. HAGEL
as 1:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , BAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN and others
Defendant:
CHARLES TIMOTHY HAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Belk et al v. Henry
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kristen Damaris Belk
Defendant:
Charles Timothy Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
