Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Momolu Sirleaf v. Correctional Officer Scott
as 21-6124
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF
BURKE v. POWELL et al
as 1:2020cv01013
Defendant:
INMATE JERRY JONES, CORRECTIONS OFFICER SCOTT A ABELE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER Joshua A Hand and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergman v. Cook County et al
as 1:2019cv06671
Plaintiff:
Corshon Bergman
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS J. DART, Cook County, Cook County Corrections Officer Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Milsap
as 9:2019cv01025
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Correction Officer Scott Milsap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
It, Anthony v. Scott
as 3:2019cv00605
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Scott
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kwaame It
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momolu Sirleaf v. Correctional Officer Scott
as 19-6393
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF
Sirleaf, Jr v. Correctional Officer Scott
as 3:2018cv00583
Plaintiff:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chappell v. Lewis, et al
as 16-4046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAPPELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER LEWIS, CORRECTION OFFICER SCOTT, CORRECTION OFFICER LANE and others
James Berry v. Gregg Hershberger
as 15-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
DPSCS SECRETARY GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, COMMISSIONER RODERICK SOWERS, CASE MANAGER II SOWERS and others
Oliver v. Richardson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
John F. Richardson, Deitrich James, John Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
