Cases 11 - 20 of 511
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others
Turnbull v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 2:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph Turnbull, IV
Defendant:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Doug Ende, Craig Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Hayden et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Thomas Porter
Defendant:
J. Hayden, David D. Clark, Det. Blake Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Clark v. USA
as 23-2548
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY D. CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones-Bey v. Sirius-El et al
as 1:2023cv06371
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Yusef Sirius-El, Walter Clendenin-Bey, D. Clark-El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Clark v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Defendant:
Wardlow, Ron Neal, Warlow and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique D Clark
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Ryan D Clark and Cacynthia B Clark
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VANDENBOOM v. CLARKE
as 1:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
MARK A. VANDENBOOM
Defendant:
BRAIN D. CLARKE and BRIAN CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
