Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Silva v. Aspen et al
as 3:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Defendant:
Marvin E. Aspen, Eli J. Richardson, Joe Binkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRENSHAW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv04058
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA D. CRENSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Defendant:
R. Ndoh, P. Vera, K. Donaldson and others
Plaintiff:
Alim S. Urmancheev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Crenshaw
as 3:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Johnny Wade Stephens
Defendant:
Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv18529
Plaintiff:
Tamara D. Crenshaw and Larry Crenshaw
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crenshaw et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-18529
Plaintiff:
Tamara D. Crenshaw and Larry Crenshaw
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Stepter v. Jepsen et al
as 1:2011cv01905
Plaintiff:
Jordache Stepter
Defendant:
J. A. Jepsen and D. Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zena Crenshaw-Logal v. City of Abilene, Texa
as 11-10264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZENA D. CRENSHAW-LOGAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ABILENE TEXAS
Crenshaw-Logal v. City of Abilene, Texas
as 1:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Zena D Crenshaw-Logal
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra Gibson v. Marcella Baker, et al
as 10-15745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCELLA BAKER, SHEILA D. CRENSHAW, JAMES BRAID and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
