Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hodge-Dillard v. Renfrow
as 4:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kerri Danielle Hodge-Dillard
Defendant:
Renfrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Chayce Hodge
as 16-11787
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHAYCE DANIEL HODGES, also known as Staks
Hodge v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hodge
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hodges v. Mayor and City Council of Annapolis, Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv03537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hodges
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Annapolis, Maryland, Michael J. Pristoop, [First Name Unknown] Ascione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Daniels , Charles N. Banks , Angela Nichols and others
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi and Police Department of the City of Jackson, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HODGES v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as NJ/2:13-cv-04435
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HODGES
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and DOES 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
James Hodges v. State of Georgia DOC, et al
as 10-12539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FNU RAUB
Hodges v. State of Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Hodges
Defendant:
State of Georgia Department of Corrections, Calhoun State Prison and Autry State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
