Cases 11 - 20 of 286
Garcia v. Forbis et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, Randall County Jail Medical Department, NFN Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Ray Acosta v. eLogHomes
as 2:2023cv09581
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Acosta
Defendant:
eLogHomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Floyd et al v. Ray
as 4:2023cv04305
Plaintiff:
Dawn F Floyd and Allen W Floyd
Defendant:
Daniel Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARTRELL SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09650
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY GARTRELL SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Calderon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Calderon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Martinez and G. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NALLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05950
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY NALLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson
as 1:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PATTERSON v. WILKES
as 5:2023cv00267
Petitioner:
DANIEL RAY PATTERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Lizarraga v. Sebastian County Sheriffs/Bailiffs et al
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Hernandez-Lizarraga
Defendant:
Sebastian County Sheriffs/Bailiffs, CRR Inmate Task Force, Greg Napier Triplett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
