Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv02708
Plaintiff:
Sharon Denise Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CareMinders Home Care, Inc. v. GTB Home Healthcare Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05316
Petitioner:
CareMinders Home Care, Inc.
Respondent:
GTB Home Healthcare Solutions, Inc., Denise Lee Seaman and William Guy Seaman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Denise Lee Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SNIPES v. LEVINSON, et al
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
DANIEL LEVINSON, STEVEN WAGNER, JAMES RODERICK O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SNIPES v. O'NEILL et al
as 1:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
JAMES RODERICK O'NEILL, DANIEL LEVINSON, SCOTT LEKAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SNIPES v. FINE et al
as 1:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JAY FINE, DENISE SHEILA HARSFIELD, KELLY PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lee v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv05927
Plaintiff:
Denise Lee
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Smith et al v. Water Treatment & Controls Company et al
as 3:2016cv00255
Defendant:
City of Donaldsonville and Water Treatment & Controls Company
Plaintiff:
Alexis Johnson, Jeffrey Johnson, Jamie Denise Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lee et al v. Boston Public Schools
as 1:2015cv10811
Defendant:
Boston Public Schools
Plaintiff:
Denise Lee and Joseph Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
