Cases 11 - 20 of 88
CHAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00638
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. CHAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Premier Medicine L L C et al v. U S Dept of Justice et al
as 5:2019cv01352
Defendant:
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bradford L Byerley and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick H Deere, M.D., Premier Medicine, LLC, Patrick H Deere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Edward Dean Hohner v. U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2019cv05100
Plaintiff:
Edward Dean Hohner
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Department of Justie U.S. Immigration and Customs Service, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Darek Kitlinski v. DOJ
as 19-1621
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Administration As to Privacy Act Claims and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI and LISA M. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, OTHER UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AND OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, JOSE FERNANDO RAMON, Special Agent, Office of Professional Responsibility, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Gamez v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 4:2019cv02391
Plaintiff:
kristy gamez
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration and United States Departement of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00760
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRNES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2019cv00761
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. BYRNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Becker et al v. US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 0:2018cv60146
Plaintiff:
Michael Becker and Corinne Mei
Defendant:
US Department of Justice-Drug Enforcement Administration, Charlotte Wroblewski, Jason Wroblewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant:
National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor:
USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master:
Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent:
Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant:
Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae:
Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner:
Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
