Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Miller v. Barrack Obama et al
as 8:2019cv02420
Defendant:
Barrack Obama and Jacob Lew
Plaintiff:
Arseles Devon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miller v. Turman et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Scotts Racks, Andalusia Health Care, Johnny Loyd and others
Plaintiff:
Scotty Devon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devon-Miller v. Obama et al
as 8:2019cv00256
Plaintiff:
Arseles Devon-Miller
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. Jayco Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00567
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Miller and Devon Miller
Defendant:
Jayco Inc , Apple Valley Camping LLC and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Miller v. Superintendent of the Shawangunk Correctional Facility
as 1:2018cv01762
Petitioner:
Devon Miller
Respondent:
Superintendent of the Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Ficarrotta et al
as 8:2017cv00790
Petitioner:
Arseles Devon Miller
Respondent:
Ronald Ficarrotta, Jane Doe Ficarrotta, Mark A. Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. S&D Glassworks, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01007
Defendant:
Sergio Campos and S&D Glassworks, LLC
Plaintiff:
Devon Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Arseles Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corre
as 16-11208
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARSELES DEVON MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00442
Petitioner:
Arseles Devon Miller
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sigman et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv13328
Plaintiff:
Brandy Sigman , Deborah Abbott , Harley Cheyenna Abbott and others
Defendant:
CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
