Cases 11 - 20 of 42
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46578
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 3:2021cv00134
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jones v. Babers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Steven T. Marshall and Gwendolyn Babers
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. MVI Field Services, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2019cv13682
Defendant:
MVI Field Services, L.L.C., The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2019cv01930
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mae Jones and Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
Norman Mitchell
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , FNU Lee , FNU Turman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Andra Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEEN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
ROMONE QUEEN and OCTAVIA MERCER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , PETER REUTER, ERNEST GRANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv03193
Defendant:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. and Dwight Jones
Plaintiff:
Johnny W. Kyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00633
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dianne Jones and Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and Merck & Co, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
