Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Bryant v. Pushmataha County, Oklahoma We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00162
Plaintiff: Jessie Eugene Bryant
Defendant: Pushmataha County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Pushmataha County, Oklahoma
as 3:2013cv01200
Plaintiff: Jessie Eugene Bryant
Defendant: Pushmataha County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Wackenhut Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00500
Plaintiff: William Eugene Bryant
Defendant: Wackenhut Corporation, Shands Hospital and Jacksonville Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALBERICO,ETAL v. NVE PHARMACEUTICAL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv01338
Plaintiff: DAVID LUND, DAVID LUND, DEBRA MOREHOUSE and others
Defendant: N.V.E., INC. d/b/a NVE PHARMACEUTICALS and BODY DYNAMICS INC.
Movant: GNCI Oldco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type: Torts - Injury None
Bryant v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01485
Plaintiff: Darryl Eugene Bryant, Sr
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio and Unknown Hagger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atlanta Bread Company International, Inc. et al v. Bryant Investment Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv02091
Plaintiff: Atlanta Bread Company International, Inc., Atlanta Bread Company International, Inc., Atlanta Bread Company International, Inc. and others
Defendant: Bryant Investment Properties, LLC and Eugene Bryant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
BRYANT v. BECK
as 1:2008cv00181
Petitioner: ROY EUGENE BRYANT
Respondent: THEODIS BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Parker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00426
Petitioner: Sidney Eugene Bryant
Respondent: David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?