Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Carrillo v. Coffman, et al
as 15-1298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO CARRILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity as elected Colorado Attorney General, RICK RAEMISCH, in his individual and official capacities, BOBBY BONNER, in his individual and official capacities and others
Zellman et al v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv02259
Plaintiff:
John Zellman and Marianne Zellman
Defendant:
Brian Porter, Elizabeth Porter and Brittany Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
COHEN et al v. LG CHEM AMERICA, INC. et al
as 4:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Cohen , Dan Wehking , Ellis Greenspan and others
Defendant:
LG Chem America, Inc, LG Chem Ltd., Panasonic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
COHEN et al v. LG CHEM AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07793
Plaintiff:
REBECCA COHEN , DAN WEHKING , ELLIS GREENSPAN and others
Defendant:
LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., LG CHEM, LTD., PANASONIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PORTER et al
as 2:2012cv00782
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT PORTER, ELIZABETH PORTER, NICOLE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
PORTER v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02762
Plaintiff:
FRANCES ELIZABETH PORTER
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PORTER v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 2:2008cv06231
Plaintiff:
FRANCES ELIZABETH PORTER
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Curtis v. Porter et al
as 2:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Curtis
Defendant:
David Porter and Vernice Elizabeth Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
