Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Martinez v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Respondent:
David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Stephen Morris
Petitioner:
Gilbert Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTINEZ v. TAX CLAIM BUREAU DIRECTOR STACY PHILE et al
as 5:2019cv04087
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MARTINEZ and GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY ASSESSMENT OFFICE, TREASURER DENNIS ADAMS, BERKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilbert Martinez v. Debbie Asuncion
as 5:2018cv02529
Petitioner:
Gilbert Marinez and Gilbert Martinez
Respondent:
Debbie Asuncion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Target Corporation
as 3:2018cv06999
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Martinez
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martinez v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
as 2:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Martinez
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01558
Petitioner:
Gilbert Martinez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garland v. Loshe et al
as 1:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C. Garland
Defendant:
Herman A. Loshe, Barrett Frappier & Weissman, LLP, Terri Hobbs and others
Interested_party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Martinez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03594
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Gilbert Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michelle Brown v. Daniel Schmedhorst, et al
as 16-51150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE JEAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL SCHMEDHORST, C/O Warden Vikki Wright, SERGEANT ALPHONSO STEVENS, LIEUTENANT DARRELL MANDIGO, C/O Warden Vikki Wright and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
