Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ford v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Tony Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDonald v. Warner et al
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
Scott W McDonald
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Jane Doe Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redd et al v. Baldwin
as 3:2011cv03049
Plaintiff:
Troy Redd, Patrick Marshall, Gary Ford and others
Defendant:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walston et al v. LaCoste et al
as 6:2010cv06126
Defendant:
21st Avenue, LLC, William C. Duval, Fisherman's Wharf, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Audrey deHoop Roth IRA, Boudewyn deHoop Roth IRA, John Daniels and others
206) 689-2822 (fax:
Attorney National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, PA
Garnishee:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gary Ford v. Tyco International (u.s.) Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77609
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
Tyco International (u.s.) Inc
Ford v. Messenger
as 3:2008cv03045
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
Messenger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ford v. Cronic et al
as 2:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Hall County Sheriff's Department and Hall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford et al v. Cronic et al
as 2:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gary Ford and Wesley Rittenberry
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Hall County Sheriff's Department and Hall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77609
Plaintiff:
GARY FORD
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
