Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Garcia et al v. Marion County, Florida
as 5:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Rinaudo, II, Daniel D. Garcia, Scott M. Gragen and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Marion County, Florida and Marion County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hayes v. Mirick et al
as 4:2018cv12238
Defendant:
Mirick O'Connell DeMallie & Lougee, LLP and John O. Mirick
Plaintiff:
Gordon H Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Mirick et al
as 4:2018cv12238
Defendant:
Mirick O'Connell DeMallie & Lougee, LLP and John O. Mirick
Plaintiff:
Gordon H Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Burgo v. Kim Stansbury, et al
as 17-30994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BURGO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM STANSBURY, JAMES MCLELLAND, PAUL JOSEPH DEMAHY and others
Donald Burgo v. Kim Stansbury, et al
as 17-30917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BURGO
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM STANSBURY, JAMES MCLELLAND, PAUL JOSEPH DEMAHY and others
Burgo v. Stansbury et al
as 6:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
Donald Burgo
Defendant:
Kim Stansbury , James McLelland, Paul Joseph DeMahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Salad et al
as 5:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
Jammie H Hayes
Defendant:
Abdiwali Ali Salad and Big G Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
Cari H. Hayes
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hayes v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00816
Plaintiff:
Cari H. Hayes
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
