Cases 11 - 20 of 320
Brewington v. McKinney, et al
as 23-1505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOAH J. BREWINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY E. MCKINNEY, Director, MDEA, AARON M. FREY, HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM and others
BREWINGTON v. JOYCE et al
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
NOAH BREWINGTON
Defendant:
KEVIN J JOYCE, TODD B BRACKETT, NIRAV SHAH and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe DH v. Scottsdale Inns LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (D.H.) and Jane Doe DH
Defendant:
Scottsdale Inns LLC doing business as Howard Johnson, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Incorporated, Scottsdale Inn LLC doing business as Howard Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BREWINGTON v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
NOAH BREWINGTON
Defendant:
ROY E MCKINNEY, AARON FEY, HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. BRIGHT MA AVE., LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
Defendant:
BRIGHT MA AVE., LLC and JOSEPH FAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hall v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Garramy Hall
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Howard Johnson, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard JohnsonIn re: Howard Johnson
as 23-1085
Petitioner:
In re: HOWARD JOHNSON
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Howard Johnson International, INC., v. Singh
as 2:2022ms00109
Plaintiff:
Howard Johnson International, INC.,
Defendant:
Gurdeep Singh
James Johnson v. James P. Hanlon
as 22-3066
Petitioner:
JAMES HOWARD JOHNSON
Respondent:
JAMES P. HANLON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
