Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Palmer et al v. A Plus Trucking, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Shelly L. Lanz, Tanraj Singh Bookher, Garry Mercer Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Palmer and Christina S. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. AMERICAN TRADERS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv21499
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADERS, INC. and HARINDER SINGH
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINGH v. THE BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE ZONING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 3:2018cv11831
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. KUBSCH, JR., THE BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, THE BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE ZONING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
HARINDER SINGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv06931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Guru Lodging, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Defendant:
Guru Lodging, LLC, Harinder Singh, Jagtar Otal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vedrine v. The Palace Fine Indian Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv60715
Plaintiff:
Brijith Vedrine
Defendant:
The Palace Fine Indian Cuisine, Inc. , Global Palace Cuisine, Inc. , Harinder Singh and others
Mediator:
Cindy Niad Hannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Basra v. Holder
as 12-3296
Petitioner:
Harinder Singh Basra
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
