Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Howell v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Howell
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HOWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv04352
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale v. Dearie
as 19-1150
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha Diamond, Jeffrey Howell, Henry Shapio and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Hale
ARIBUABO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00893
Plaintiff:
IRA HORNE, MICHAEL COSGROVE, DUSTIN PRICE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lester Canada v. Gene Beitler, et al
as 19-15606
Defendant:
RONALD SCHRECKENGOST, ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ROMEO ARANAS
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY HOWELL, C.O. and GENE BEITLER, C.O.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LESTER CANADA
Hale v. Dearie et al
as 1:2019cv01257
Defendant:
Ameet B. Kabrawaza, Henry Shapio, Reena Raggi and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aribuabo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00475
Plaintiff:
Ira Horne, Michael Cosgrove, Dustin Price and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puente et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02778
Plaintiff:
Ira Yedlin, Jacinta Gonzalez Goodman, Poder in Action and others
Defendant:
Glenn Neville, Lane White, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rodgers et al
as 5:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gerrard D. Jones
Defendant:
Patricia Rodgers, Mark Geiger, Jeffrey Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Rouse et al
as 5:2016cv00697
Plaintiff:
Elton Lee Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Marile Rouse, Jeffrey Howell, Chris Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
