Cases 11 - 20 of 260
Swett Urquieta v. Bowe
as 1:2024cv01379
Petitioner:
Maria Elena Swett Urquieta
Respondent:
John Francis Bowe
Interested Party:
S.B.S.
Medaglia v. Middleton et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
John Francis Medaglia, III
Defendant:
Shawn Middleton and New Ellenton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. Medical Department
as 6:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Valdez et al
as 3:2023cv08607
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mahoney
Defendant:
Sheena Valdez, Danielle Thorhaug, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Green v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
John Francis Green
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brady v. Butter et al
as 6:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
John F. Brady and John Francis Brady
Defendant:
William Jose Butter, Otto Trans, Inc. and USAA General Idemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SERUMAGA et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09019
Plaintiff:
DEVIS RAUBEN TUKACYUNGURWA, WILLY SERUMAGA, RICHARDS NDAULA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BISCH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCIS BISCH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tukacyungurwa et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02851
Plaintiff:
Devis Rauben Tukacyungurwa, Willy Serumaga, Richards Ndaula and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
UMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24256
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCIS UMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
