Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hughes et al v. City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa et al
as 1:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Gary Hughes , Arash Yarpezeshkan , David L Mazgaj and others
Defendant:
City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa and Gatso USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sparks v. Gordy, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and Daniel Rieben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 4:2012cv00062
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2011cv00168
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2011cv00010
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Lee Posey Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2011mc00007
Petitioner:
James Anthony Sparks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Sparks v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Sparks
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange and Robert E. Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPARKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39175
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SPARKS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SPARKS et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92295
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. SPARKS and PATRICIA SPARKS
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
