Cases 11 - 20 of 46
CROSBY v. CENEGENICS ELITE HEALTH
as 2:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY
Defendant:
CENEGENICS ELITE HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROSBY v. CENEGENICS ELITE HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01734
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY
Defendant:
CENEGENICS ELITE HEALTH, INC., JOHN DOES (1-10), JANE DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bottom v. Yukon City of et al
as 5:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Grayson Bottom
Defendant:
Yukon City of, Yukon Municipal Authority, John Alberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. OMEGA FLEX, INC.
as 1:2016cv00148
Defendant:
OMEGA FLEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crosby et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
James Crosby and Mildred Crosby
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC , Walter Investment Management Corp. , Best Insurors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Crosby v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-11777
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES CROSBY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cunningham v. Peak Legal Advocates et al
as 3:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Peak Legal Advocates, Debt Pay Gateway, Inc., Susan Lafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Crosby v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv10786
Plaintiff:
James Crosby
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Crosby et al v. Allen Samuels Chevrolet, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01463
Plaintiff:
James Crosby and Randall Burgard
Defendant:
Allen Samuels Chevrolet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crosby v. Heil, et al
as 12-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JAMES CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET HEIL, J.D. SCOLLARD, CHRISTINE TYLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
