Cases 11 - 20 of 721
Martinez Estrada v. Garland
as 24-172
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Martinez et al v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company et al
as 1:2023cv03441
Plaintiff:
Jose Elias Martinez, Efrain Hernandez Bartolo, Isaias Hernandez Bartolo and others
Defendant:
The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Centerline Construction Company and Congratulations Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Martinez
as 23-50895
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Miguel Martinez
Rafael Martinez v. Jose Luis Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv10040
Plaintiff:
Rafael Martinez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Martinez, Nina De Rocio Romero and Does 1 to 10
Quijano et al v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernando Quijano, Duval Quintero, Henrri Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Colt Jamison Hansen, Hansen Brand LLC and Westcoast Growers LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Leyva-Martinez v. USA
as 8:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Jose Leyva-Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
