Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holden v. Clarke
as 2:2018cv00033
Petitioner:
Michael K. Holden
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kohn #393687 v. Ernst et al
as 2:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Floyd E. Kohn #393687
Defendant:
Unknown Ernst, Unknown Sellick, Unknown Gurnoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Holden v. Haynes et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brenda K Holden
Defendant:
Darrell G Haynes , Doe Business Entities 1 - 10, Raymar Enterprises & Transportation and others
Counter_claimant:
Washington State Patrol
Counter_defendant:
Brenda K Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Navia v. Teresi, et al.
as 1:2011cv08766
Plaintiff:
Mario Navia , Jr.
Defendant:
M J Teresi, M A Reno, T D Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Holden
as 6:2011cv06475
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Santiago
Defendant:
K. Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
