Cases 11 - 20 of 55
PINNEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
as 1:2019cv03842
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY
Defendant:
ROBERT K BARNES, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and ROBERT K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinney v. United States Supreme Court
as 4:2019cv00930
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant:
United States Supreme Court and Robert K Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivatharan Natkunanathan v. USDC-CASA
as 19-73095
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified:
REDMOND K. BARNES, individually, and as clerk and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN
Petitioner:
SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN
Tracy Nixon v. Redmond Barnes
as 19-7128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracy Nixon
Defendant / Appellee:
Redmond K. Barnes, Individual capacity
NIXON v. BARNES
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant:
REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Snipes v. Wayne Andersen, et al
as 19-5203
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Northern Illinois District Court Case Analyst, James B. Zagel, Northern Illinois District Court Judge, Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leon Snipes
Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
as 19-6743
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA D. NESBITT, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States and REDMOND K. BARNES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03017
Defendant:
Lisa Nesbitt, Scott S. Harris and Redmond K. Barnes
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
