Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Robbins v. Does 1-10
as 6:2018mc00219
Defendant:
Baylor University
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 2 and others
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10
Movant:
William K. Robbins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Case name not on file
as 4:2018mc02087
Movant:
William K Robbins
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
NORTHPARK COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION v. ROBBINS
as 1:2017cv01817
Plaintiff:
NORTHPARK COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
DANNY K ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Great West Casualty Company v. Pamela Robbin
as 15-1181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PAMELA K. ROBBINS, as Administratix of the Estate of MIKE DOUGLAS ROBBINS, Deceased
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY v. LAKEVILLE MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00198
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP, HOKER TRUCKING, LLC, LAKEVILLE MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Lovely #210684 v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lovely #210684
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Veda Dove, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Dorch v. Timothy Stallman, et al
as 11-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DORCH
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY STALLMAN, SUSAN H. WILSON, Nurse Practitioner, LORI L. DAVIS, RN and others
Brock v. Chason et al
as 1:2011cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mandel T. Brock
Defendant:
Christy Chason, Pamela H. Bostic, Angela F. Liverman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
