Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35,921
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lewis v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv04502
Plaintiff: Sabrina Lewis
Defendant: Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc, L'Oral USA, Inc., L'Oral USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Morrisey et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant: Patrick Morrisey, John Bernabei, James Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Henderson v. McMahan et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff: Ernest Henderson
Defendant: Judge Teresa McMahan, Judge Jennifer E. Porter, Judge Deborah Lewis Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant: RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: James Harris
Defendant: Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Robert Morgan v. USA
as 24-11687
Petitioner: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?