Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Quinn v. Zerkle et al
as 2:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Taylor Quinn
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher K. Zerkle, Sgt. Paxton Lively, Sgt. Rick Keglor and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Toon and Eric Toon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vonville v. Luthcke et al
as 3:2020cv02446
Defendant:
Jessica Ladd, Tamhannock Township, Detective Craig Vanlouvender and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Joseph Vonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick v. Thomas et al
as 9:2020cv03816
Defendant:
A/W Kevin Ford, OFC Crowder, Captain Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Derrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Mays v. T. Smith
as 20-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HALFAST, Case Manager, OFFICER SLAYDON, OFFICER GLASS and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Herbert v. Ginty et al
as 7:2020cv06348
Defendant:
Robert Zangla, Frank J. LaBuda, Deputy Officer Ruggerio and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah F. Herbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vogel v. Ginty et al
as 7:2020cv06349
Defendant:
Robert Zangla, Frank J. Labuda, Deputy Officer Ruggerio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Vogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correa et al v. Ginty et al
as 1:2020cv05791
Plaintiff:
Richard Vogel, Jeremiah F. Herbert and Anthony Correa
Defendant:
Robert Zangla, Frank J. LaBuda, Deputy Officer Ruggerio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Unnamed Defendants
as 5:2019ct03223
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendants, Victor Locklear, Betty Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappelle v. Minnix et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Lt. Christopher Wymer, Doe No. 5, Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Chappelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03186
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, S. Ma'at, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
