Cases 11 - 20 of 9,929
Howard Lane NE Industrial Owner, LLC v. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Howard Lane NE Industrial Owner, LLC
Defendant:
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Wu et al
as 1:2024cv11273
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Michelle Wu, Brittany Vo, London Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Collins et al
as 1:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Nick Collins, Nick Collins' Son, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Walsh et al
as 1:2024cv11275
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Martin Joseph Walsh, Joan Marie Duffy, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hulett v. AdventHealth Shawnee Mission et al
as 5:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
TC Hulett, Jr
Defendant:
AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, Ashley D. Stillwell, Lauren W. Camara Dela Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
United States of America v. Lane
as 24-1254
Defendant:
ANDREW LANE and Joey Green
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Scott County et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Scott County, Tim Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
