Cases 11 - 20 of 222
Doe v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Detective Larry Brown and Sheriff Kandy Fatheree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Manning, Christine Crawford, Keith Manning and others
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kentrell Welch v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-16893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, STEVE SISOLAK, Terminated per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, AARON FORD, Terminated #7AC and others
Stubbs #398621 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Ervin Stubbs #398621
Defendant:
Sara Schroeder, Kevin Pelky, P. Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv12368
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Ford
Defendant:
Larry Brown and D. Gowdy
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18783
Plaintiff:
BRENDON LARRY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. USA
as 6:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Larry Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00027
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Abrams, Stanley Albansky, Joseph Alosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doe v. Brown et al
as 5:2021cv02417
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Sheriff's Deput larry brown, Sheriff's Deput Chris Plance, Detective Larry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
