Cases 11 - 20 of 6,074
KING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEO KING, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Rosales v. Industrial Sales & Services
as 24-40289
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Joseph Rosales, III and Leo C. Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Industrial Sales & Services, L.L.C. and Bernard Gochis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eli Porter, et al v. Derrell Thigpen, et al
as 24-11373
Plaintiff:
ELI PORTER, MICHAEL SINGLETON, TIMOTHY VAN BEVERHOUDT and others
Defendant:
DERRELL THIGPEN, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, MATT SOWELL, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's, JONATHAN MALONE, in their individual and official capacities as LEO's and others
United States of America v. Dickerson
as 24-2478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LEO MYRON DICKERSON
Poole, Leo V. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80469
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole and Vincent Leo Poole
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Load Delivered Logistics, LLC v. Freight Direct LLC et al
as 7:2024cv02709
Defendant:
Lipa Krausz, Freight Direct LLC d/b/a Go Forward and Leo Krausz
Plaintiff:
LOAD DELIVERED LOGISTICS, LLC d/b/a CAPSTONE LOGISTICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
