Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express, Inc., FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Banks v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 13-4081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REV. ULLI KLEMM, ADMINISTRATOR OF RELIGION, JAMES J. MCGRADY, SUPERINTENDENT and others
Hoover v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc and Biomet Manufacturing Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as INN/3:13-cv-01028
Plaintiff:
Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc and Biomet Manufacturing Corp
Hoover et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-11664
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hoover and Michael Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Hoover et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11664
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hoover and Michael Hoover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glenn v. McGrady et al
as 1:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Glenn
Defendant:
James J. McGrady, Michael Hoover, Michael Klopotoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KOELSCH v. THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2011cv05681
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN KOELSCH
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER , MARK WILSON , KAREN ANDREADIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Martel
as 2:2011cv00662
Petitioner:
Michael Hoover
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott et al v. Inglehardt et al
as 4:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael W Scott and Miguel Javier Collazzo
Defendant:
Sharon Inglehardt, Anderson, Shanika and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
