Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Anaeme et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv02555
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Y Adiboye, S Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Lawson et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
James R Lawson , Michael Alberson , William T Allen and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ANAEME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Defendant:
ED, JESICCA, MR ACEVADO and others
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C. ANAEME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01140
Defendant:
Mr Acevado, Mr Acevado, David Ackerschott and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Matthew Carroll v. Stryker Corporation
as 09-4111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
STRYKER CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Carroll et al v. GSI Commerce South, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carroll, Matthew Carroll, Frederick Grist and others
Defendant:
GSI Commerce South, Inc., Hank Reeves and Curtis Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Carroll v. United States of America
as 5:2009hc02096
Petitioner:
Matthew Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bachelor v. Carroll
as 3:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Bachelor and Jacqueline Bachelor
Defendant:
Matthew Carroll and Matthew Carroll
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Carroll v. Stryker Corporation
as 3:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carroll
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
