Cases 11 - 20 of 111
PAGAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
RANDY PAGAN
Defendant:
MS. JOHNSON, JUDGE PORTELLI and JUDGE MATTHEW JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Darryl C. Carter
as 23-148
Petitioner:
Darryl C. Carter
Respondent:
Gary Jenkins, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, Urban Pathways, Inc., domestic non-profit organization, Leslie Segars, in-house Director of Social Services and others
Carter v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2022cv10326
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Carter
Defendant:
Gary Jenkins, Urban Pathways Inc., Leslie Segars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Syville v. City of New York
as 22-3041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alphonso Syville
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Paul Hargrow and Smila Kodali
Defendant:
A. Brown, Pernal, Ms. Robinson and others
Timothy McNeal v. J. Hutchinson
as 22-7319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY MCNEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HUTCHINSON, Acting Warden, C. NEVILS, MR. GLENN and others
Clark v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv04201
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Clark
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Sgt. Crutchfield, Deputy Gracia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Macky et al
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Collins
Defendant:
Mr. Macky, Ms. Victory, Ms. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Collins v. Mackey et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Collins
Defendant:
Mr. Mackey, Ms. Victory, Ms. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Macky et al
as 1:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Charles Norman Larson Pace
Defendant:
Mr. Macky, Ms. Victory and Ms. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
