Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05065
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Goodson v. Cable et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Derek Shane Goodson
Defendant:
Edward Cable, AJ LNU, Nathan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2016cv09851
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Hill, Timothy Hill, Ricky Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Bell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Joe T Bell
Defendant:
Sean Patrick Morgan, Janet Cox, Nathan Lewis Dills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etka v. Adams et al
as 3:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Zachary Etka
Defendant:
Michael Adams, Nathan Lewis and Daniel Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Lewis v. Baltic Panther M/V, et al
as 14-31364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COOPER/T. SMITH MOORING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and BALTIC PANTHER LIMITED
Intervenor - Appellee:
R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR., KOCH & SCHMIDT, L.L.C., GINO J. RENDEIRO and others
Lewis v. Federal Aviation Administration et al
as 3:2013cv00992
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael Huerta
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Nathan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lewis v. M/V Baltic Panther et al
as 2:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lewis
Defendant:
Baltic Panther M/V, Genco Shipping & Trading LTD and Cooper/T. Smith Mooring Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0905
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
