Cases 11 - 20 of 8,812
Alter (PS) v. Gates et al
as 1:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
William Neil Alter
Defendant:
John Gates, Raymond Lee, III, Tommy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingston v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Neil Kingston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Danyell Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Ohio Transmission LLC v. Neils Creek Property Company, LTD.
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ohio Transmission LLC
Defendant:
Neils Creek Property Company, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Roberson v. Bennett
as 24-3285
Petitioner:
NEIL JAMES ROBERSON
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Neil Pal v. , et alIn re: Neil Pal v. , et al
as 24-1940
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL PAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Ames et al v. Sexton et al
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Mary Ames and Brianna Triplett
Defendant:
Trina Sexton, Michael Beaton, Tzar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Scranton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neil Scranton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
