Cases 11 - 20 of 304
Nolasco-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 23-3951
Petitioner:
JOEL NOLASCO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nolasco v. Multi Service Solutions, LLC
as 0:2023cv03618
Plaintiff:
Jose Leyva Nolasco
Defendant:
Multi Service Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 fl FLSA: Maximum Hours
Michael McMahon et al v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09815
Plaintiff:
Michael McMahon, Teresa Batson, Jeannine Bedard and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Eric Garcetti, Karen Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NOLASCO v. UNION HOT BAGLE & DELI LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22333
Plaintiff:
Jaime Nolasco
Defendant:
UNION HOT BAGLE & DELI LLC (DBA UNION HOT BAGELS),, Abuabeid M Nayef, Kevin Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendez Nolasco, et al v. Garland
as 23-1947
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO EVELIO MENDEZ NOLASCO and BLANCA AMERICA NIZ MENDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cesar Flores Nolasco v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2131
Petitioner:
CESAR FLORES NOLASCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Wilson Orthopedics Medical & Rehabilitation Center v. Car Accident Compensation Administration, et al
as 23-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILSON ORTHOPEDICS MEDICAL & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CAR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION, (ACAA) and MARGARITA NOLASCO-SANTIAGO
Nolasco v. Francesca's Acquisition, LLC
as 4:2023cv04049
Plaintiff:
Wendy Nolasco
Defendant:
Francesca's Acquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
