Cases 11 - 20 of 30
RUFFINGS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv00601
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ANTHONY SAXBY, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ALFRED GREGORY, JR., CORRECTIONS OFFICER JASON MARSHALL and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RUFFINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla et al v. City Of Oakland et al
as 3:2018cv06175
Plaintiff:
Sindy Padilla and Enrique Maldonado Petino
Defendant:
Oakland Police Department, City Of Oakland, Christian Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Gresham et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Miles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Russell County Jail, Officer Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Brown
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Theresa Dyer and Officer Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Ellis et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00369
Plaintiff:
James Charley Moon
Defendant:
Dr. Ellis, Theresa Dyer, Officer Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Hanks v. Randall Roger
as 15-11295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER RANDALL ROGERS, Individually
Donatell v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2015cv02334
Defendant:
Norma Alicia-Carpio, Vickie Athukorala, Jane Balao and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Donatell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. OFFICER RANDALL BAKER
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
DEVINE STEPHEN ANDRE EDWARDS
Defendant:
OFFICER RANDALL BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Calhoun v. Timothy Outlaw, et al
as 15-60756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK D. CALHOUN
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Warden, DOTY, Warden, Marshall County Correctional Facility, OFFICER RANDALL and others
Shaffer v. Randall et al
as 1:2015cv05770
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Shaffer
Defendant:
Officer Randall and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
